The predominant Western approach to understanding mental disorder, as indic
ated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), is
based on a biomedical perspective which sees mental disorders as "natural
kinds" or discrete entities which manifest as dysfunction within individual
s. Following from this is the view that the DSM's primary syndromes are uni
versal, based on the assumption that this dysfunction is similar across div
erse human populations. The cross-cultural literature, however; reveals sig
nificant differences in the manifestation of these syndromes across ethnic
groups thereby challenging the universalist position. In response to this s
hortcoming of the predominant contemporary conceptualization of mental diso
rder, a constructivist approach is offered which, it is argued, has a numbe
r of important advantages over the traditional view. Finally, the implicati
ons of a constructivist definition are discussed, demonstrating the importa
nt connection between theory and practice. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd.