There is a palpable sigh of relief in some quarters under the impression th
at India is finally moving towards a virtual two-party system organised aro
und certain conservative and liberal co-ordinates, But does India need that
sort Of a regime? In thoughts as well as in actions, the reign of this par
ticular liberal consensus for about half a century has exacerbated social f
ragmentation, religious intolerance, and economic underdevelopment. There i
s no sign of change for the better in this consensus. The conservative cons
ensus differs little from its rival. It invokes Hindu epics, which, in fact
, glorify civil wars that had divided the people. The epic age of Indian sp
iritualism is marked by great diversity of thoughts which cannot possibly b
e contained within any one culture. And the other beliefs that emerged subs
equently deserve no less respect. The conservative agenda is thus incoheren
t. Communalism and casteism are the two main threats today. The basic probl
em has two dimensions: inter-religion, and intra-religion.
This paper suggests a: possibility of resolution, inspired by two universal
truths, namely, human sanctity, and human rights; the former justifies the
domain, while the latter enumerates the content. The first one is ape anci
ent revelation in all religions; the second one is of recent origin. The ba
sic ideals of India include secularism and equality in the civil society, f
ull employment and growth in the economy, and democracy in polity. This pap
er tests the prevailing conservative and liberal consensus in the light of
such standards, And, above all, it explores a possible path towards these i
deals.