The evidence pertaining to inferences derived from working memory test scor
es does not appear as developed as the evidence documenting the relation be
tween working memory and performance. Gaps in the literature include docume
nting the relations among working memory tests of similar and different ite
m content. The authors proposed that data from these tests would fit a corr
elated two-factor model best where the latent factors are based on item con
tent. A total of 201 undergraduates completed four versions of a working me
mory measure. Confirmatory factor analytic results supported our hypothesis
. These data suggest that some working memory measures are not interchangea
ble.