Though the German electoral system has provided the opportunity of split-ti
cket voting since 1953, until now there has only been mere speculation conc
erning the rationality of ticket-splitting. In this paper we examine the ra
tionality thesis empirically, using data provided by the official represent
ative electoral statistics of the Federal Republic. Modifying the Downsian
notion of rational voting, rational ticket-splitting is defined in terms of
coalition building and of voters' expectations of the electoral success of
candidates and parties. Applying this conceptual framework, it will be sho
wn that the combinations of first and second votes actually chosen by a maj
ority of the German electorate can rather be conceived of as a product of a
ccident than of tactical considerations. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All
rights reserved.