Endoscopic hemostasis in sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage: Its efficacy and safety

Citation
Hj. Kim et al., Endoscopic hemostasis in sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage: Its efficacy and safety, ENDOSCOPY, 31(6), 1999, pp. 431-436
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
0013726X → ACNP
Volume
31
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
431 - 436
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-726X(199908)31:6<431:EHISHI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Background and Study Aims: Hemorrhage is induced in approximately 0.5-12% o f endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (ES) procedures. We prospectively inves tigated the risk factors for ES-induced hemorrhage and evaluated the safety as well as the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis. Patients and Methods: The study included 1304 patients who underwent ES bet ween July 1996 and June 1998. Epinephrine spray was used initially for hemo static treatment. If bleeding persisted, an epinephrine injection was given consecutively. In patients with exposed vessels, epinephrine injection fol lowed by alcohol injection was given. Results: ES-induced hemorrhage occurred in 136 (10.4 %) patients. The type of sphincterotome used (needle-knife sphincterotome, P = 0.025) and the cut ting speed (the so-called "zipper" cut, P = 0.049) were revealed as signifi cant variables with regard to the occurrence of bleeding. Mild, moderate, a nd severe bleeding were noted in 108 (79.4 %), 22 (16.2 %), and six (4.4 %) patients, respectively. Once bleeding occurred, patients with an associate d ampullary lesion (impacted stone or cancer) or with coagulopathy were mor e likely to bleed profusely. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all patient s. However, rebleeding occurred in eight patients who were initially classi fied as having moderate or severe bleeding. Finally, ES-induced hemorrhage was successfully controlled in all patients after 1-3 treatment sessions (m ean 1.1 sessions). The difference in the incidence of complications between the groups treated or not treated by endoscopic hemostasis was not statist ically significant. Conclusions: ES-induced hemorrhage occurred in 10% of the patients studied. The use of needle-knife sphincterotomy and the cutting speed were independ ent risk factors for the occurrence of bleeding. Once bleeding occurred, it s severity was affected by an associated ampullary lesion (impacted stone o r cancer) or coagulopathy. Endoscopic hemostasis with epinephrine and/or al cohol was effective and safe in ES-induced hemorrhage.