Magnetic resonance angiography has taken a huge step forward since the intr
oduction of contrast-enhanced MR angiography using gadolinium chelates. The
more conventional MR angiographic techniques, such as time-of-flight and p
hase-contrast MR angiography, have been ousted by contrast-enhanced MR angi
ography in most vascular areas. However, in imaging the lower extremities,
the major obstacle is the length of the vascular tree. In order to cover th
e entire peripheral vasculature, at least two to three fields of view are r
equired. Using contrast-enhanced MR angiography, the best results are obtai
ned if the vessels of interest are imaged during passage sage of a bolus of
contrast material. Vessel-to-background contrast in subsequent acquisition
s using subsequent injections of contrast material is hampered by recircula
tion and leakage of previously injected gadolinium, enhancing both the veno
us system and surrounding tissue. To overcome this problem several research
groups have come up with various solutions. The three main strategies empl
oyed can be classified as either bolus catch, bolus chase, or bolus track t
echniques. The purpose of this article is to explain working mechanisms of
the three bolus imaging strategies for imaging both inflow and outflow vess
els of the lower extremities, to show their advantages and disadvantages, a
nd to review results described in the literature in imaging patients using
these techniques.