Mf. Catalano et al., Evaluation of metastatic celiac axis lymph nodes in patients with esophageal carcinoma: accuracy of EUS, GASTROIN EN, 50(3), 1999, pp. 352-356
Background.. Endosonography (EUS) is the most accurate modality for assessi
ng depth of tumor invasion and local lymph node metastasis. However, its ac
curacy in the identification of metastatic (celiac axis) lymph nodes is les
s well defined.
Our objective in this study was to determine the accuracy of EUS in detecti
ng celiac axis lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Methods: Two hundred fourteen patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent
preoperative EUS. Of these, 145 underwent attempted surgical resection and
staging, and 4 underwent EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of mediastinal a
nd celiac lymph nodes. Local (mediastinal) and distant (celiac axis) lymph
nodes were assessed for malignancy on the basis of four criteria (larger th
an 1 cm, round, homogeneous echo pattern, sharp borders). Accuracy of EUS w
as determined by means of correlating histopathologic findings for the rese
cted lymph nodes or results of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytologic
examination.
Results: Surgical exploration (n = 145) and fine-needle aspiration cytologi
c examination (n = 4) revealed metastatic celiac axis lymph nodes in 23 and
metastatic mediastinal (local) lymph nodes in 93 of 149 patients with esop
hageal carcinoma. According to defined criteria for malignant lymph nodes,
there were 19 true-positive and 4 false-negative results. Sensitivity for t
he diagnosis of celiac lymph node metastasis with EUS was 83% with a 98% sp
ecificity. For the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastasis, sensitiv
ity was 79% and specificity was 63%. All patients with malignant celiac axi
s lymph nodes had local T3 (tumor breaching adventitia) or T4 (tumor invadi
ng adjacent organs) disease.
Conclusion: EUS is an excellent modality in the evaluation of metastatic ce
liac axis lymph nodes in patients with esophageal carcinoma. These findings
should be used in selecting options for treatment. Sensitivity for detecti
ng malignancy is consistent with that of prior studies, and local and regio
nal Lymph nodes and specificity is significantly higher.