While widely used in research, the 1991 Rome criteria for the gastroduodena
l disorders, especially symptom subgroups in dyspepsia, remain contentious.
After a comprehensive literature search, a consensus-based approach was ap
plied, supplemented by input from international experts who reviewed the re
port. Three functional gastroduodenal disorders are defined. Functional dys
pepsia is persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper
abdomen; evidence of organic disease likely to explain the symptoms is abse
nt, including at upper endoscopy. Discomfort refers to a subjective, negati
ve feeling that may be characterized by or associated with a number of non-
painful symptoms including upper abdominal fullness, early satiety, bloatin
g, or nausea. A dyspepsia subgroup classification is proposed for research
purposes, based on the predominant (most bothersome) symptom: (a) ulcer-lik
e dyspepsia when pain (from mild to severe) is the predominant symptom, and
(b) dysmotility-like dyspepsia when discomfort (not pain) is the predomina
nt symptom. This classification is supported by recent evidence suggesting
that predominant symptoms, but not symptom clusters, identify subgroups wit
h distinct underlying pathophysiological disturbances and responses to trea
tment. Aerophagia is an unusual complaint characterized by air swallowing t
hat is objectively observed and troublesome repetitive belching. Functional
vomiting refers to frequent episodes of recurrent vomiting that is not sel
f-induced nor medication induced, and occurs in the absence of eating disor
ders, major psychiatric diseases, abnormalities in the gut or central nervo
us system, or metabolic diseases that can explain the symptom. The current
classification requires careful validation but the criteria should be of va
lue in future research.