One approach to representing knowledge or belief of agents, used by economi
sts and computer scientists, involves an infinite hierarchy of beliefs. Suc
h a hierarchy consists of an agent's beliefs about the state of the world,
his beliefs about other agents' beliefs about the world, his beliefs about
other agents' beliefs about other agents' beliefs about the world, and so o
n. (Economists have typically modeled belief in terms of a probability dist
ribution on the uncertainty space. In contrast, computer scientists have mo
deled belief in terms of a set of worlds, intuitively, the ones the agent c
onsiders possible.) We consider the question of when a countably infinite h
ierarchy completely describes the uncertainty of the agents. We provide var
ious necessary and sufficient conditions for this property. It turns out th
at the probability-based approach can be viewed as satisfying one of these
conditions, which explains why a countable hierarchy suffices in this case.
These conditions also show that whether a countable hierarchy suffices may
depend on the "richness" of the states in the underlying state space. We a
lso consider the question of whether a countable hierarchy suffices for "in
teresting" sets of events, and show that the answer depends on the definiti
on of "interesting".