This paper is about re-representing the lifeworlds experienced by different
participants in the 'same' physics classrooms; dissatisfied with the monol
ithic accounts that dominate the educational literature, we offer here an a
ttempt to w/ri(gh)te classroom research. This paper, therefore, has a dual
purpose: We exemplify how authors might want to represent different perspec
tives on the 'same' classroom and we build on this example to argue for w/r
i(gh)ting research by drawing on literary forms that differ from traditiona
l master narratives. W/ri(gh)ting requires reading in new ways; by skipping
text, readers risk missing out on the reflexivity of our argument.