Locomotor plasticity after spinal injury in the chick

Authors
Citation
G. Muir, Locomotor plasticity after spinal injury in the chick, J NEUROTRAU, 16(8), 1999, pp. 705-711
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
ISSN journal
08977151 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
705 - 711
Database
ISI
SICI code
0897-7151(199908)16:8<705:LPASII>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Functional recovery after spinal cord injury likely depends, in part, on th e reorganization of undamaged spinal circuitry, Segmental afferent input fr om the limbs remains largely intact after spinal injury and may provide an important source of activation and regulation of the spinal circuits that h ave lost descending input as a result of the injury. This purpose of this s tudy was to investigate the contribution of cutaneous afferent inputs to th e recovery of motor function after spinal injury in the chick. After latera l thoracic spinal hemisection, the motion of the ipsilateral limb was impai red during both walking and swimming. By 2 weeks postoperatively, limb moti on recovered to preoperative values for walking but not for swimming. It wa s hypothesized that phasic afferent inputs experienced during walking, but not swimming, contributed to recovery of limb motion during walking. When a source of phasic cutaneous input was provided during swim training session s, limb motion gradually improved to preoperative values, After 2 weeks of training, this improved motion was retained even after the source of cutane ous stimulation was removed. The proposed mechanism is an experience-depend ent strengthening of the circuits activated during the improved limb motion , leading to a permanent change in limb action during swimming. Thus, the a fferent inputs experienced during movement repetition are important during the acquisition of learned movements after spinal injury. These results are discussed in terms of behavioral, physiological, and anatomical evidence f or spinal plasticity in other species. It is concluded that the spinal cord has significant plastic capabilities, and efforts should be directed towar d maximizing the contribution of this plasticity to functional recovery aft er spinal cord injury.