I have developed something of a reputation for criticizing freely and
frequently at our meetings and in my writings. You say you like this a
nd find it useful and entertaining. As you like it, you are welcome to
more of it. My comments and criticisms are presented under the follow
ing headings: (1) criticize at your peril; (2) how it all started (unj
ustly accused); (3) abbreviations (a source of perennial aggravation,
confusion, and waste of time); (4) mysterious bodies in mesotheliomas;
(5) call a crystal a ''crystal,'' not a ''crystalloid''; (6) electron
microscopy-a study of osmium artifacts; (7) length-to-diameter ratio
of microvilli (mission impossible); (8) lamellar bodies (a popular but
debased term); (9) amyloid filaments, not fibers; (10) filaments and
microtubules do not branch; (11) there is no such thing as pseudomelan
osis; (12) botched histochemistry (just about every gastrointestinal t
ract pigment was misdiagnosed by histochemistry); (13) intranuclear Ru
ssell bodies, not ''Dutcher bodies''; and (14) nuclear pores and virus
-like particles (a new development in an old farce).