Recent studies have analyzed the diversionary theory of international confl
ict. The theory, which holds that state leaders occasionally turn to extern
al conflict as a means of dealing with domestic political problems, has bee
n widely accepted for centuries. Despite its intuitive appeal, quantitative
studies have failed to document the phenomenon. Recent work has significan
tly refined the argument and empirical evidence supporting the revised theo
ry has been presented Because these empirical analyses have focused almost
exclusively on the United States, it is not clear whether the theory is gen
eralizable. Our purpose here is to test the revised diversionary theory in
Great Britain for the 1950-92 period. The findings show that the level of p
ublic support for the British government is in fact associated with the pro
bability that Britain threatens, displays, or uses force abroad. These find
ings are consistent with the theoretical argument, suggesting that it is ap
plicable outside the United States.