The origin of this pair of notes is a study that was not party centered bur
rather noted that a null hypothesis of no majority party effect could not
be refuted. By changing the dependent and/or independent variables of the o
riginal study, however, Binder, Lawrence, and Maltzman (1999) find evidence
of such an effect. This comment accepts their findings as evidence of majo
rity party influence but questions the durability and robustness of the so-
called party effect. Durability is questioned because there is little evide
nce of an outcome-consequential nature. Robustness is questioned because th
e findings are sensitive to measures and to model specification. Finally, t
he conclusion highlights the need for an explicit, formal, outcome-conseque
ntial theory of majority party strength.