Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the pulmonary function after
a segmentectomy with that after a lobectomy for small peripheral carcinoma
of the lung. Patients and methods: Between 1993 and 1996, segmentectomy an
d lobectomy were performed on 48 and 133 good-risk patients, respectively.
Lymph node metastases were detected after the operation in 6 and 24 patient
s of the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups, respectively, For bias reducti
on in comparison with a nonrandomized control group, we paired 40 segmentec
tomy patients with 40 lobectomy patients using nearest available matching m
ethod on the estimated propensity score. Results: Twelve months after the o
peration, the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups had forced vital capacitie
s of 2.67 +/- 0.73 L (mean +/- standard deviation) and 2.57 +/- 0.59 L, whi
ch were calculated to be 94.9% +/- 10.6% and 91.0% +/- 13.2% of the preoper
ative values (P = .14), respectively, The segmentectomy and lobectomy group
s had postoperative 1-second forced expiratory volumes of 1.99 +/- 0.63 L a
nd 1.95 +/- 0.49 L, which were calculated to be 93.3% +/- 10.3% and 87.3% /- 14.0% of the preoperative values, respectively (P = .03). The multiple l
inear regression analysis showed that the alternative of segmentectomy or l
obectomy was not a determinant for postoperative forced vital capacity but
did affect postoperative 1-second forced expiratory volume. Conclusion: Pul
monary function after a segmentectomy for a good-risk patient is slightly b
etter than that after a lobectomy, However, segmentectomy should be still t
he surgical procedure for only poor-risk patients because of the difficulty
in excluding patients with metastatic lymph nodes from the candidates for
the procedure.