A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy

Citation
Sm. Roth et al., A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy, J VASC SURG, 30(3), 1999, pp. 453-460
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
07415214 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
453 - 460
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(199909)30:3<453:ARAFDS>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the appropriate timing and frequency of duplex ultrasound scanning after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the detection of high-grade stenosis caused by recurrent carotid stenos is or contralateral atherosclerotic disease progression. Methods: In 221 patients who underwent 242 CEAs, duplex scanning was perfor med before, during, and after operation (in 3-month to 6-month intervals). High-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (peak systolic velocity, >300 cm/s; diastolic velocity, >125 cm/s; ICA/common carotid artery ratio, >4) prompted the recommendation for repair. An average of four postoperativ e scanning procedures was performed during a mean follow-up period of 27.4 months. Results: Intraoperative duplex scan results prompted the immediate revision of 12 repairs (4.9%), and one perioperative stroke (<1%) occurred. Six CEA s (2.7%) had asymptomatic recurrent stenosis (>50% diameter-reduction [DR]; systolic velocity, >125 cm/s) develop. Only one of six patients had >75% D R stenosis develop and underwent reoperation (<1% yield for CEA surveillanc e). The yield of surveillance of the unoperated ICA was higher (P =.003), a nd 12% of unoperated sides had progressive stenosis (n = 21) or occlusion ( n = 3) develop, which led to seven CEAs for high-grade stenosis. Disease pr ogression to >75% DR stenosis was five times as frequent (P =.002) in patie nts with >50% DR stenosis initially. All patients but one who required cont ralateral endarterectomy for disease progression had >50% ICA stenosis when first seen. During the follow-up period, no disabling strokes ipsilateral to an operated carotid artery occurred, but three strokes occurred in the h emisphere of the contralateral unoperated ICA. Conclusion: The yield of duplex scan surveillance after CEA was low. Only 1 3 patients (5.9%) had severe disease develop to warrant additional interven tion. Progression of contralateral disease rather than restenosis was the m ost common abnormality that was identified. Duplex scanning at 1-year to 2- year intervals after CEA is adequate when a technically precise repair is a chieved and minimal contralateral disease (<50% DR) is present. A policy of duplex scan surveillance and reoperation for high-grade stenosis was assoc iated with a 1.6% incidence rate of disabling stroke during the follow-up p eriod.