Healing rates and cost efficacy of outpatient compression treatment for leg ulcers associated with venous insufficiency

Citation
Wa. Marston et al., Healing rates and cost efficacy of outpatient compression treatment for leg ulcers associated with venous insufficiency, J VASC SURG, 30(3), 1999, pp. 491-498
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
07415214 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
491 - 498
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(199909)30:3<491:HRACEO>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective: Although newer techniques to promote the healing of leg ulcers a ssociated with chronic venous insufficiency are promising, improved healing rates and cost effectiveness are unproven. We prospectively followed a ser ies of patients who underwent treatment with outpatient compression for ven ous stasis ulcers without adjuvant techniques to determine healing rates an d costs of treatment. Methods: Two hundred fifty-two patients with clinical or duplex scan eviden ce of chronic venous insufficiency and active leg ulcers underwent treatmen t with ambulatory compression techniques. The patients were prospectively f ollowed with wound measurements at 1-week to 2-week intervals, and the fact ors that were associated with delayed healing were determined. Results: Of all the ulcers, 57% were healed at 10 weeks of treatment and 75 % were healed at 16 weeks. Ultimately, 96% of the ulcers healed, and only 1 major amputation was necessitated (0.4%). Initial ulcer size and moderate arterial insufficiency (ankle brachial index, 0.5 to 0.8; n = 34) were fact ors that were independently associated with delayed healing (P <.01). Patie nt age, ulcer duration before treatment, and morbid obesity did not signifi cantly affect healing times. The cost of 10 weeks of outpatient treatment w ith compression techniques ranged from $1444 to $2711. Conclusion: The treatment of venous stasis ulcers with compression techniqu es results in reliable, cost-effective healing in most patients. Current ad juvant techniques may prove to be useful but are likely to be cost effectiv e only in a minority of cases, particularly in patients with large initial ulcer size or arterial insufficiency.