Reproducibility of measures of overuse of cataract surgery by three physician panels

Citation
Jk. Tobacman et al., Reproducibility of measures of overuse of cataract surgery by three physician panels, MED CARE, 37(9), 1999, pp. 937-945
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
MEDICAL CARE
ISSN journal
00257079 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
937 - 945
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-7079(199909)37:9<937:ROMOOO>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Assess the reproducibility of methods to measure overuse of cat aract surgery. OBJECTIVES. The objectives of this study are: (1) To determine the extent o f agreement about clinical scenarios among, between, and within three physi cian panels; (2) to apply ratings of clinical scenarios from three panels t o actual surgeries; and (3) to assess reproducibility of rates of appropria te use and overuse. METHODS. Three physician panels scored 2,894 clinical scenarios for the app ropriate use of cataract surgery. One thousand and twenty charts were abstr acted and assigned to the clinical scenario that best corresponded to the p atient's clinical situation. Two hundred and fifty nine clinical scenarios were required to assign the cases. Weighted kappa values, confidence interv als, and percentages of agreement were used to measure agreement among, bet ween, and within panels. RESULTS. The all ophthalmologist panel (OP) and the convened multispecialty panel (CM) each rate 92% of the cases as appropriate use, compared with 70 % by the mail-in multispecialty panel (MM). The MM have higher uncertain (2 6% vs. 8% and 7%) and higher inappropriate use (3.5% vs. 0.1% and 1.9%). Fo r the clinical scenarios, the CM and the MM have similar percentages of ove ruse (6.6%, 7.3%), in contrast to the OP (0.4%). The weighted kappa value f or the overall level of agreement about the clinical scenarios among the th ree panels is 0.53, consistent with moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS. Study results demonstrate reproducibility for assessment of ap propriate use of surgery between the OP and CM. However, both multispecialt y panels rate more clinical scenarios as inappropriate use than the ophthal mologist panel. Thus, reproducibility between the CM and the OP may be attr ibutable to the low percentage of overuse of cataract surgery in the study population. The overall level of agreement about the clinical scenarios amo ng the panels is moderate.