Am. Hemborg et L. Despres, Oviposition by mutualistic seed-parasitic pollinators and its effects on annual fitness of single- and multi-flowered host plants, OECOLOGIA, 120(3), 1999, pp. 427-436
The balance of intimate relationships between plants and seed-eating pollin
ators can depend on pollinator behaviour in relation to floral characters,
such as flower size and flower number. Here, we examined how pollinator ovi
position in relation to these traits affected annual fitness (seed output)
of single- and multi-flowered Trollius europaeus along altitudinal gradient
s in subarctic Sweden and the French Alps. Small flies (Chiastocheta spp.)
pollinate T. europaeus and their larvae feed on developing seeds. Assuming
that late flowers in multi-flowered plants attracted flies to the earliest
flower on the same plant, we expected more eggs and higher seed predation i
n early multiple flowers than in single flowers. Relative seed predation wo
uld thereby increase with flower number. Both in Sweden and the Alps, more
eggs were placed on large flowers. Early multiple flowers were slightly lar
ger than single flowers, and about twice the size of secondary flowers. As
a result, and possibly combined with the effects of secondary flowers, earl
y multiple flowers attracted more ovipositing flies and experienced relativ
ely higher seed predation. However, this did not generally result in higher
seed predation of multi-flowered hosts. Multiple flowers had greater seed
output than single flowers at all altitudes, also in the high alpine and su
barctic sites, where single flowers were more abundant. We hypothesise that
the distribution of multiple flowers generally is enforced by environmenta
l factors, rather than by fly-host plant interactions, because only very ra
rely tin triple-flowered alpine plants) was seed predation disproportionate
, and the relationship skewed to the disadvantage of the host. The outcome
of the mutualistic interaction was often similar in alpine and subarctic po
pulations, but the underlying factors were different. Subarctic flowers had
high abortion and low predation rates, while alpine flowers experienced th
e reversed situation. The higher fly abundance in the Alps suggests a more
intense mutualistic interaction than in Sweden. Despite varying ecological
and environmental conditions at these sites, the mutualistic relationship w
as generally in balance. However, when it was unbalanced, this could be exp
lained by fly behaviour in response to floral traits, and by differences in
fly abundance.