Study objective: To compare the efficacy of a novel antidote, insulin,
with standard treatments, glucagon and epinephrine, in a canine model
of acute beta-blocker toxicity. Methods: Anesthetized dogs were fitte
d with instruments by means of thoracotomy and vascular cutdown for mu
ltiple cardiodynamic, hemodynamic, metabolic, and electrical measures.
After basal measurements were taken, animals received intravenous pro
pranolol (.25 mg/kg/minute) continuously for the remainder of the expe
riment. Toxicity was defined as a 25% decrease in the product of heart
rate times mean blood pressure. Thirty minutes after the development
of toxicity, toxic measures were taken (treatment 0 minutes), and then
the animals (n=6 each group) received either sham (saline solution),
insulin (4 IU/minute with glucose clamped), glucagon (50 mu g/kg bolus
, then 150 mu g/kg/hour infusion), or epinephrine (1 mu g/kg/minute).
Animals were monitored until death or for 240 minutes. Results: Propra
nolol decreased contractility, left ventricular pressure, and systemic
blood pressure, and resulted in death of all sham-treated animals by
150 minutes. Six of six insulin-treated, four of six glucagon-treated,
and one of six epinephrine-treated animals survived. Survival was gre
ater for insulin-treated animals, compared with either glucagon-treate
d (P<.05) or epinephrine-treated animals (P<.02) by the log-rank test.
Insulin-treated animals were characterized by improved cardiodynamics
and hemodynamics, increased myocardial glucose uptake, and decreased
serum potassium. Conclusion: Insulin is a superior antidote compared w
ith glucagon or epinephrine in an anesthetized canine model of acute b
eta-blocker toxicity.