I examine the solution of the BFKL equation with NLO corrections relevant f
or deep inelastic scattering. Particular emphasis is placed on the part pla
yed by the running of the coupling. It is shown that the solution factorize
s into a part describing the evolution in Q(2), and a constant part describ
ing the input distribution. The latter is infrared dominated, being describ
ed by a coupling which grows as x decreases, and thus being contaminated by
infrared renormalons. Hence, for this part we agree with previous assertio
ns that predictive power breaks down for small enough x at any Q(2). Howeve
r, the former is ultraviolet dominated, being described by a coupling which
falls like 1/(ln(Q(2)/Lambda(2))+A[<(alpha)over bar>(s)(Q(2))ln(1/x)](1/2)
) with decreasing x, and thus is perturbatively calculable at all x. Theref
ore, although the BFKL equation is unable to predict the input for a struct
ure function for small I, it is able to predict its evolution in Q(2), as w
e would expect from the factorization theory. The evolution at small x has
no true powerlike behavior due to the fall of the coupling, but does have s
ignificant differences from that predicted from a standard NLO in cu, treat
ment Application of the resummed splitting functions with the appropriate c
oupling constant to an analysis of data, i.e., a global fit, is very succes
sful. [S0556-2821(99)07213-6].