Stimulation of cell wall biosynthesis and structural changes in response to cytokinin- and elicitor-treatments of suspension-cultured Phaseolus vulgaris cells
D. Robertson et al., Stimulation of cell wall biosynthesis and structural changes in response to cytokinin- and elicitor-treatments of suspension-cultured Phaseolus vulgaris cells, PL PHYS BIO, 37(7-8), 1999, pp. 611-621
Qualitative sugar flux into cell wall polysaccharides has been determined f
or two model systems. The first, treatment of suspension-cultured French be
an (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cells with an increase in the cytokinin/auxin ra
tio and in the concentration of sucrose, models some aspects of differentia
tion. Wall changes are characterised by up to a five-fold increase in thick
ness due to the laying down of extra wall material. Sugar flux following la
belling of cells with [C-14]-sucrose was examined during the period of maxi
mum extractable catalytic activities of the enzymes of sugar nucleotide con
version determined previously. Increased secretion was observed in all majo
r groups of polysaccharides, particularly the cellulosic fraction. Analysis
of the sugars in the hemicellulosic fraction indicated that the newly synt
hesised polysaccharide was most probably xylan. It was confirmed by immunol
ocalisation of xylan in these walls. This treatment thus increases incorpor
ation into the wall of components characteristic of secondary wall. In the
second system, which models the defence response, suspension cultures were
treated with an elicitor from the walls of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. A
gain, sugar flux was determined by labelling cells with [C-14]-sucrose and
examined during the period determined previously of maximum extractable cat
alytic activities of the enzymes of sugar nucleotide conversion. Increased
secretion into unextractable polymers was the major change and was consiste
nt with the occurrence of oxidative processes leading to immobilisation of
some wall components. Callose, a polysaccharide characteristic of the defen
ce response was immunolocalised in these walls but not in those of control
cells. (C) Elsevier, Paris.