STD testing policies and practices in US city and county jails

Citation
Ms. Parece et al., STD testing policies and practices in US city and county jails, SEX TRA DIS, 26(8), 1999, pp. 431-437
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease","da verificare
Journal title
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
ISSN journal
01485717 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
431 - 437
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-5717(199909)26:8<431:STPAPI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Studies have shown that sexually transmitted dis ease (STD) rates are high in the incarcerated population. However, little i s known about STD testing policies or practices in jails. Goal: To assess STD testing policies and practices in jails. Study Design: The Division of STD Prevention developed and distributed an e -mail survey to 94 counties reporting more than 40 primary and secondary ca ses in 1996 or having cities with more than 200,000 persons. State and loca l STD program managers completed the assessment in collaboration with healt h departments and the main jail facilities in the selected counties. Results: Most facilities (52-77%) had a policy for STD screening based only on symptoms or by arrestee request, and in these facilities, 0.2% to 6% of arrestees were tested. Facilities having a policy of offering routine test ing tested only 3% to 45% of arrestees. Large facilities, facilities using public providers, and facilities routinely testing for syphilis using Stat RPR tested significantly more arrestees (P < 0.05). Approximately half of t he arrestees were released within 48 hours after intake, whereas 45% of fac ilities did not have STD testing results until after 48 hours. Conclusion: Most facilities had a policy for STD screening based only on sy mptoms or by arrestee request. Facilities having a policy of routine STD te sting are not testing most of the arrestees, There is a small window (< 48 hours) for STD testing and treatment before release. Smaller jails and faci lities using private providers may need additional resources to increase ST D testing levels. Correctional facilities should be considered an important setting for STD public health intervention where routine rapid STD screeni ng and treatment on-site could be implemented.