It is now widely accepted that members of the public should be involved in
environmental decision-making. Many researchers have attempted to define pr
ocess and outcome principles for "good" public participation. The emphasis
of this study is on the process. We asked participants in a forest policyma
king process about their ideas of "good" process. We used an approach based
on the qualitative method of grounded theory to inductively identify princ
iples. Seven categories of principles emerged from the analysis: access to
the process, power to influence process and outcomes, access to information
, structural characteristics to promote constructive interactions, facilita
tion of constructive personal behaviors, adequate analysis, and enabling of
future processes. We elaborate and discuss the categories and variations a
mong the participants. The results provide a derailed and intriguing pictur
e of how the people in our case study think about participation.