Dj. Skiest et P. Keiser, CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF EOSINOPHILIA IN HIV-INFECTED INDIVIDUALS, The American journal of medicine, 102(5), 1997, pp. 449-453
PURPOSE: TO assess the clinical significance of peripheral eosinophili
a in HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: In a retrospective case-contro
l study we compared 42 HIV-infected patients (cases) with peripheral e
osinophilia (absolute eosinophil count > 500 cells/mm(3)) with 84 HIV-
infected controls without eosinophilia. Cases were matched to controls
by date, and by CD4 cell count. Data on clinical parameters possibly
associated with eosinophilia were collected and compared among cases a
nd controls. RESULTS: Eosinophilia was seen in patients with late-stag
e HIV disease (median CD4 cell count of 26 cells/mm(3)). Cases were mo
re likely to be black (52% versus 18%, P = 0.0001), have pruritus (50%
versus 20%, P = 0.002), and have a physician-documented rash (76% ver
sus 52%, P = 0.02). Specific cutaneous diagnoses that were more preval
ent in cases versus controls were eosinophilic folliculitis (24% versu
s 1%, P = 0.0001), atopic dermatitis (14% versus 1%, P = 0.01), and pr
urigo nodularis (7% versus O, P = 0.07). Other parameters commonly ass
ociated with eosinophilia such as allergic reactions, parasitic infect
ion, malignancy, and adrenal insufficiency were not found at higher in
cidence in cases. CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilia in AIDS patients is associ
ated with cutaneous disease, but not with other conditions commonly as
sociated with eosinophilia including parasitic infections, allergic re
actions, or malignancy. Extensive work up for asymptomatic eosinophili
a in patients with AIDS and cutaneous disease is not warranted. (C) 19
97 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.