Quality specifications in laboratory medicine - current consensus views

Authors
Citation
Cg. Fraser, Quality specifications in laboratory medicine - current consensus views, ACCRED Q A, 4(9-10), 1999, pp. 410-413
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
ISSN journal
09491775 → ACNP
Volume
4
Issue
9-10
Year of publication
1999
Pages
410 - 413
Database
ISI
SICI code
0949-1775(199908/09)4:9-10<410:QSILM->2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Every analytical method used in laboratory medicine can be fully described in terms of its performance characteristics. Ideally, quality specification s should be available for all of these, particularly precision and bias. Sp ecifications for these can be set using a variety of strategies. Considerat ion of the clinical settings of monitoring individual patients and diagnosi s using reference intervals shows that generally applicable quality specifi cations can be based on the components of biological variation, namely, wit hin-subject [CVI] and between-subject [CVG] variation. Current consensus is that precision should be < 1/2CV(I) and bias should be <1/4 [CVI2 + CVG2]( 1/2). This strategy has advantages in that data on components of biological variation are easily available on more than 180 quantities. Dissemination of information on application of objective quality specifications needs att ention from those involved in publication, manufacturers and organisers of external quality assessment schemes.