C. Bruch et al., M-mode analysis of mitral annulus motion for detection of pseudonormalization of the mitral inflow pattern, AM J CARD, 84(6), 1999, pp. 692-697
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is a frequent cause of heart fa
ilure. Doppler echocardiography has become the method of choice for the non
invasive evaluation of LV diastolic dysfunction. However, pseudonormalizati
on of mitral inflow often presents a diagnostic problem in clinical practic
e. We sought to define the role of mitral annulus motion in this setting. W
e performed echocardiography in 36 consecutive subjects (age 59 +/- 10 year
s). Eighteen had recently (within 3 months) been diagnosed with coronary ar
tery disease, 18 had clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease, and 15
had symptoms of heart failure (New York Heart Association class 2.4 +/- 0.5
). The amplitude (EM) and the slope (slope E) of early diastolic motion of
the septal mitral annulus were derived from M-mode analysis. Left heart cat
heterization was performed for direct measurement of LV enddiastolic pressu
re. Pseudonormalization defined by an E/A ratio >1 and a LV end-diastolic p
ressure greater than or equal to 16 mm Hg was found in 9 patients. All pati
ents with pseudonormalization were symptomatic (New York Heart Association
class 2.8 +/- 0.5). Patients with and without pseudonormalization did not d
iffer with respect to the E/A ratio (1.29 +/- 0.44 vs 1.16 +/- 0.23, p = NS
), deceleration time (182 +/- 38 vs 205 +/- 42 ms, p = NS), and isovolumic
relaxation time (88 +/- 24 vs 92 +/- 18 ms, p = NS). In the group with pseu
donormalization, a significant reduction of E-M (3.9 +/- 1.6 vs 5.7 +/- 1.5
mm, p = 0.008) and slope E (24.5 +/- 11.8 vs 43.9 +/- 7.7 mm/s, p <0.001)
was detected. Using E-M <4.3 mm and slope E <35 mm/s as cut points, sensiti
vity and specificity for the detection of pseudonormalization were 66% and
82% for E-M and 77% and 87% for slope E, respectively. There was no signifi
cant relation between LV end-diastolic pressure as a measure of preload and
either E-M (r = 0.44, p >0.5) or slope E (r = 0.30, p >0.2). Thus, E-M and
slope E may be preload-independent tools for assessing LV diastolic dysfun
ction in symptomatic patients with a pseudonormal mitral inflow pattern and
elevated filling pressures. (C) 1999 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.