Jv. Fahy et al., Effect of aerosolized anti-IgE (E25) on airway responses to inhaled allergen in asthmatic subjects, AM J R CRIT, 160(3), 1999, pp. 1023-1027
Intravenous administration of a humanized monoclonal antibody of IgE (E25)
attenuates the early and late phase response to inhaled allergen in allergi
c asthmatic subjects. To test whether direct delivery of E25 to the airway
might have the same effect, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, three
group study in 33 subjects with mild allergic asthma (20 to 46 yr of age, 2
1 men, FEV1 > 70% predicted). The airway responses to aerosolized allergen
were determined at baseline, after 2 and 8 wk of once daily treatment with
aerosolized placebo (n = 11), aerosolized E25 1 mg (n = 12), or aerosolized
E25 10 mg (n = 10), and after 4 wk of treatment withdrawal. We found that
E25 was detectable in the serum during aerosol treatment, although serum Ig
E did not change significantly in any of the three groups during treatment.
In addition, both doses of E25 were no more effective than placebo in atte
nuating the early phase responses to allergen at both times during treatmen
t. Although aerosolized E25 was generally well tolerated, one subject recei
ving aerosolized E25 10 mg daily was found to have serum IgG and IgA antibo
dies to E25. We conclude that aerosol administration of an anti-IgE monoclo
nal antibody does not inhibit the airway responses to inhaled allergen in a
llergic asthmatic subjects. We speculate that the observed lack of efficacy
may be due to the inability of aerosol route of delivery to result in high
enough concentrations of E25 in the tissue compartments surrounding IgE ef
fector cells to neutralize IgE arising from local airway and pulmonary sour
ces and IgE arising from the vascular space. Additionally, the aerosol rout
e of delivery of monoclonal antibodies may be more immunogenic than the par
enteral route.