Severe community-acquired pneumonia - Risk factors and follow-up epidemiology

Citation
M. Ruiz et al., Severe community-acquired pneumonia - Risk factors and follow-up epidemiology, AM J R CRIT, 160(3), 1999, pp. 923-929
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
1073449X → ACNP
Volume
160
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
923 - 929
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(199909)160:3<923:SCP-RF>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine risk factors for severe community-acq uired pneumonia (CAP) as well as to compare microbial patterns of severe CA P to a previous study from our respiratory intensive care unit (ICU) origin ating from 1984 to 1987. Patients admitted to the ICU according to clinical judgment were defined as having severe CAP. For the study of risk factors, a hospital-based case-control design was used, matching each patient with severe CAP to a patient hospitalized with CAP but not requiring ICU admissi on. Microbial investigation included noninvasive and invasive techniques. O verall, 89 patients with severe CAP were successfully matched to a control patient. The presence of an alcohol ingestion of greater than or equal to 8 0 g/d (odds ratio [OR] 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4 to 10.6, p = 0 .008) was found to be an independent risk factor for severe CAP and prior a mbulatory antimicrobial treatment (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.79, p = 0.009) to be protective. Streptococcus pneumoniae (24%) continued to be the most frequent pathogen; however, 48% of strains were drug-resistant. "Atypical" bacterial pathogens were significantly more common (17% versus 6%, p = 0.00 6) and Legionella spp. less common (2% versus 14%, p = 0.004) than in our p revious study, whereas gramnegative enteric bacilli (GNEB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa continued to represent important pathogens (6% and 5%, respectiv ely). Our findings provide additional evidence for the importance of the in itiation of early empiric antimicrobial treatment for a favorable outcome o f CAP. Variations of microbial patterns are only in part due to different e pidemiological settings. Therefore, initial empiric antimicrobiaI treatment will also have to take into account local trends of changing microbial pat terns.