Comparison of three methods for the in vivo estimation of body compositionin dairy ewes

Citation
F. Bocquier et al., Comparison of three methods for the in vivo estimation of body compositionin dairy ewes, ANN ZOOTECH, 48(4), 1999, pp. 297-308
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
ANNALES DE ZOOTECHNIE
ISSN journal
0003424X → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
297 - 308
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-424X(199907/08)48:4<297:COTMFT>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Three methods for estimating in vivo body fat in sheep, by the assessment o f body water using the deuterium oxide (D2O) dilution technique, adipose ce ll size (ACS) measurement and body condition scoring (BCS), were studied in mature ewes and compared to results obtained after slaughter and chemical analyses. Twenty Lacaune dairy ewes were slaughtered at three stages of lac tation (30 days [n = 8], 60 days [n = 8] and 110 days [n = 4]), with a mean body weight (BW) of 72.7 +/- 7.6 kg, 16.0 +/- 4.7 kg of body lipids (LIP) and 42.7 +/- 3.8 kg of total body water. Body fatness ranged from 10.3 to 2 8.8% of empty body weight. Although the ewes were relatively fat, the mean adipose cell volume of subcutaneous pericaudal or sternal adipose tissue (2 09 or 287 pl, respectively) was in the lower range of previously reported v alues, while cells from omental adipose tissue had a larger mean volume (80 4 pi) than has been previously reported. Due to differences in the frame of ewes, prediction of body lipids through D2O, ACS and BCS was improved by i ncluding body weight in the model. The best equations using ACS were obtain ed with subcutaneous fat tissues (sternal tissue: residual coefficient of v ariation (rCV) = 13.9% and pericaudal: rCV = 17.8%), followed by internal t issue (omental: rCV = 19.5%). The rCVs of the prediction of body lipids wit h these in vivo methods were in general agreement with published works on c attle or sheep i.e. D2O: 8.8 %, pericaudal ACS: 13.9 % and BCS: 16.7%. The interest and limitations of the methods studied are discussed in terms of d ifferent experimental objectives and constraints. ((C) Elsevier / Inra).