The aim of the study was to assess the management of elderly hypertensives
in general practice. A sample of 2 727 general practitioners filled a speci
ally designed questionnaire between February and March 1998 in France, Area
s covered by the questionnaire included risk of hypertension, blood pressur
e measurement and treatment.
Most respondents (97%) considered that hypertension remains a cardiovascula
r risk factor in elderly but 4% thought that hypertension is usefull by imp
roving target organ perfusion. Fifgty-five percent recorded both standing a
nd supine measurement, 34% reported measuring blood pressure with patient s
upine only. All respondents reported that they would start antihypertensive
treatment on the basis of blood pressure level. A minimum systolic level o
f 160 and 180 mmHg was given by 65% and 27% practioners respectively while
2% required a minimum level ranging from 139 to 149 mmHg. Among the respond
ents who considered that isolated systolic hypertension is pathological (74
%), 73% and 19% used 160 and 180 mmHg as cut-off respectively. Among those
who considered that isolated systolic hypertension is physiological (23%),
43% and 46% initiated treatment above 160 and 180 mmHg, respectively. A min
imum diastolic level of 90 mmHg was reported by many respondents (61%) whil
e 34% required a cut-off level of 100 mmHg. Comparison of systolic and dias
tolic levels showed that 49% practioners started antihypertensive therapy a
bove 160/90 mmHg and 16% above 180/100 mmHg. Less than 1% reported a thresh
old level of 140/90 mmHg. Most practioners (85%) treated hypertensive patie
nts regardless of their age. The others treated patients younger than 65 ye
ars old (3%), 70 (2%), 80 (5%) and 90 (4%). All respondents reported that t
hey would treat their patients to prevent Vascular complications, mainly ce
rebrovascular (96%), cardiac (89%) and kidney (75%) disease.
In conclusion, for all general practioners, hypertension remains a cardiova
scular risk factor in elderly and hypertensive therapy is beneficial to pre
vent cardiovascular complications. This study reveals some inter-physician
variability in blood pressure measurement and treatment. The risk of standi
ng blood pressure fall is not taken into account by 66 % of respondents. Va
riability in age threshold is in accordance with the lack of published data
on benefice of hypertensive treatment in the very old. The risk of isolate
d systolic hypertension is under-estimated by 27% of physicians who reporte
d a minimum systolic blood pressure level of 180 mmHg to initiate therapy.