Rationale : Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) is commonly used i
n clinical practice, whereas its added value to the management of hypertens
ion is not definitely documented.
Objective : the OCTAVE II study was launched in 1991 to explore the prognos
tic value of ABPM, compared to that of the gold standard, the clinical bloo
d pressure measurement.
Methods: Two hundred and six French cardiologists recruited 3569 participan
ts over 18 years of age, provided they deemed ABPM was useful (mean age of
56 years, 52% of men, 65% already treated by antihypertensive drugs). The p
rognostic value of various blood pressure measurements, systolic or diastol
ic, clinical or ambulatory (diurnal, nocturnal or during 24 hours), has bee
n assessed in multivariate models adjusted on the baseline characteristics
associated with risk. The outcome was the occurrence of a major cardiovascu
lar event, including stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death
.
Results : after an average follow-up of five years, cardiovascular morbidit
y was known for 85% of the participants, and their vital status for 91%. On
the whole population, the best prognostic indicators were systolic blood p
ressure compared with diastolic, ABPM compared with clinical blood pressure
measurement, and nocturnal ABPM compared with diurnal ABPM. In the untreat
ed participants at baseline, cardiovascular risk regularly-increased among
the four groups : normotensives, white-coat hypertensives, dippers, non-dip
pers. Between the extreme categories, the cardiovascular event rate was mul
tiplied by 6.5.
Conclusion : in this French population, ABPM and most of all its nocturnal
component, was better correlated with cardiovascular prognosis. It remains
to assess : 1) the general value of our findings, 2) the respective values
of self blood pressure measurement versus ABPM, and 3) whether ABPM allows
a better risk prevention.