H. Buerkle et al., Thermal and mechanical antinociceptive action of spinal vs peripherally administered clonidine in the rat inflamed knee joint model, BR J ANAEST, 83(3), 1999, pp. 436-441
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
It has been demonstrated recently that in addition to its spinal analgesic
actions, the alpha(2) adrenoreceptor agonist clonidine also has peripheral
analgesic activity. Few data are available regarding the antinociceptive ef
fects of spinal vs peripherally delivered clonidine in inflammatory pain. T
hus we have studied spinal (intrathecal=IT) and peripheral (intra-articular
=IA) administration of clonidine in the rat inflamed knee joint model. Ther
mal and mechanical antinociception was assessed in rats over 28 h using a m
odified Hargreaves box and von Frey hairs after induction of tonic persiste
nt inflammatory pain by injection of a kaolin-carrageenan mixture into the
right knee joint. Thirty minutes after injection of kaolin-carrageenan, clo
nidine was administered via an IT catheter or by IA injection into the righ
t inflamed knee joint or by subcutaneous injection (SC) (highest effective
intra-articular dose). The specific site of action was assessed using the a
lpha;! antagonist yohimbine IT, IA or SC. Clonidine IT resulted in thermal
and mechanical antinociception during ongoing inflammation, which was not e
nhanced by inflammation. In contrast, IA delivery of clonidine, which also
produced a dose-dependent thermal and mechanical antinociceptive effect, re
vealed a leftward shift in the antinociceptive activity produced by ongoing
inflammation. Yohimbine inhibited the antinociceptive action of clonidine
at the site of delivery. We suggest that clonidine produces potent thermal
and mechanical antinociception regardless of the route of administration. H
owever, chronic inflammatory processing appears to enhance the antinocicept
ive efficacy of the peripheral alpha(2) agonist.