Solvent for etomidate may cause pain and adverse effects

Citation
Aw. Doenicke et al., Solvent for etomidate may cause pain and adverse effects, BR J ANAEST, 83(3), 1999, pp. 464-466
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
ISSN journal
00070912 → ACNP
Volume
83
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
464 - 466
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(199909)83:3<464:SFEMCP>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that the solvent for etomidate was a factor in the incidence of pain and other side effects after injection, and that these w ere associated with histamine release. Nine of 10 volunteers who received e tomidate in a propylene glycol formulation reported moderate to severe pain on injection; only one of 10 subjects who received a lipid emulsion formul ation reported mild pain (P<0.05). The incidence of venous sequelae in the injected vein over the next 8 days was 50% in the propylene glycol group an d 0% in the lipid emulsion group (P<0.05). In one volunteer in the propylen e group, there was a 13-fold increase in histamine concentrations and in on e subject a four-fold increase. In the lipid emulsion group, no volunteer h ad an increase in histamine concentrations >1 ng ml(-1). We conclude that e tomidate formulated in propylene glycol may cause direct injury to vascular endothelium resulting in pain and venous sequelae, whereas etomidate in li pid emulsion does not. There was no relationship between pain or venous seq uelae and histamine release.