E. Grunfeld et al., Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primarycare versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial, BR J GEN PR, 49(446), 1999, pp. 705-710
Background. Routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in specialist clini
cs is standard practice in most countries. Follow-up involves regularly sch
eduled breast cancer check-ups during the disease-free period. The aims of
follow-up are to defect breast cancer recurrence and to provide psychosocia
l support to the patient; however, little is known about patients' views on
breast cancer follow-up.
Aim. To assess the effect on patient satisfaction of transferring primary r
esponsibility for follow-up of women with breast cancer in remission from h
ospital outpatient clinics to general practice.
Method. Randomized controlled trial with 18 months' follow-up in which wome
n received routine follow-up either in hospital outpatient clinics or from
their own general practitioner. Two hundred and ninety-six women with breas
t cancer in remission receiving regular follow-up care at two district gene
ral hospitals in England were included in the study. Patient satisfaction w
as measured by means of a self-administered questionnaire supplied three ti
mes during the 18-month study period.
Results. The general practice group selected responses indicating greater s
atisfaction than did the hospital group on virtually every question. Furthe
rmore, in the general practice group there was a significant increase in sa
tisfaction over baseline; a similar significant increase in satisfaction ov
er baseline was not found in the hospital group.
Conclusion. Patients with breast cancer were more satisfied with follow-up
in general practice than in hospital outpatient departments. When discussin
g follow-up with breast cancer patients, they should be provided with compl
ete and accurate information about the goals, expectations, and limitations
of the follow-up programme so that they can make an informed choice.