Reported are the results of a formal decision analysis which facilitated th
e choice of the most appropriate test-treatment strategy for visceral leish
maniasis in areas where the disease is endemic. The following strategies we
re compared: treatment of all suspects (strategy A); testing by means of pa
rasitological investigation followed by treatment of positives (strategy B)
; two-step testing by means of the direct agglutination test (DAT) followed
by treatment of patients with high titres as well as those with parasitolo
gically confirmed borderline titres (strategy C); and DAT followed by treat
ment of positives (strategy D).
The results for each strategy were expressed as costs in US$ per death aver
ted. The effectiveness of strategies C and D was close to that of strategy
A and far better than that of strategy B. The cost-effectiveness ratio for
strategies C and D (US$ 465 per death averted) was not substantially higher
than that of testing by means of parasitological investigation followed by
treatment of positives (strategy B), which was the most cost-effective str
ategy at US$448 per death averted. At current prices of antimonial drugs, t
he cost of lest-treatment strategies depends more on the cost of treatment
than on that of testing. The use of a sensitive serological test such as th
e DAT is recommended as the basis of test-treatment strategies for visceral
leishmaniasis in areas where the disease is endemic.