Ag. Schuurman et al., Association of energy and fat intake with prostate carcinoma risk - Results from the Netherlands Cohort Study, CANCER, 86(6), 1999, pp. 1019-1027
BACKGROUND. The roles of energy and fat intake as risk factors for prostate
carcinoma are still questionable. Therefore, these factors were evaluated
in the Netherlands Cohort Study described in this article.
METHODS. The cohort study consisted of 58,279 men ages 55-69 years at basel
ine in 1986. After 6.3 years of follow-up, 642 incident prostate carcinoma
cases were available for analysis. Intake of energy, fat, and separate fatt
y acids were measured by means of a self-administered questionnaire; fat in
take was adjusted for energy by regression analysis. The case-cohort method
was used to calculate rate ratios (RRs). Analyses were conducted for all p
rostate carcinoma cases together as well as for case subgroups (latent vs.
nonlatent and localized vs. advanced).
RESULTS. No associations were found in multivariate analyses between prosta
te carcinoma and intake of energy, total fat, total saturated fatty acids,
or total hans unsaturated fatty acids (RR highest vs. lowest quintile: 0.99
, 1.10, 1.19, and 0.99, respectively). Oleic acid intake showed a nonsignif
icant positive association (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.88-2.19). Positive associa
tions were also observed for intake of oleic acid in subgroup analyses. Lin
oleic (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.56-1.09) and linolenic (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66
-1.04) acid intake were associated with nonsignificantly decreased risks; o
nly for linolenic acid did these associations persist in subgroup analyses.
No associations were found for intake of arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoi
c acid, or docosahexaenoic acid.
CONCLUSIONS, These data suggest that certain fatty acids might be involved
in prostate carcinoma occurrence, although the possibility that these were
chance findings cannot be ruled out. (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.