P. Tangkijvanich et al., Telomerase assay for differentiating between malignancy-related and nonmalignant ascites, CLIN CANC R, 5(9), 1999, pp. 2470-2475
The differential diagnosis between malignancy-related ascites (MRAs) and no
nmalignant ascites (NMAs) has remained an essential problem in clinical pra
ctice. Our purpose was to determine the diagnostic value of ascitic fluid t
elomerase activity in discriminating these two categories compared with tha
t of cytological examination. Twenty-five MRAs and 47 NMAs as the control g
roup were enrolled in our study. In the MRA group, telomerase activity was
detected in 13 of 16 (81.3%) cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis and in 6 of
9 (66.7%) cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-associated ascites, Cont
rasting that, cytological examination was positive in only 9 of 16 (56.3%)
and 1 of 9 (11.1%) cases, respectively. In the NMA group, telomerase-positi
ve ascitic fluid samples were found in 2 of 47 (4.3%) cases, all belonging
to subgroups that contained large numbers of lymphocytes in the ascites, In
our study, the telomerase activity and cytological examination exhibited a
sensitivity of 76% and 40% and a specificity of 95.7% and 100%, respective
ly. Regarding subgroups of MRAs, the telomerase activity and cytological ex
amination demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.3% and 56.3%, respectively, in p
eritoneal carcinomatosis and a sensitivity of 66.7% and 11.1%, respectively
, in HCC-associated ascites, In conclusion, telomerase activity is a more s
ensitive marker than cytological examination for differentiating between MR
As and NMAs. It may also serve as a useful indicator for detecting early i.
p, metastasis in HCC-associated ascites.