Bj. Kneale et al., Forearm vasoconstriction in response to noradrenaline and N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine in essential hypertension, CLIN SCI, 97(3), 1999, pp. 277-282
A role for abnormal NO production in essential hypertension remains controv
ersial. Blunted vasoconstriction of forearm resistance vasculature in respo
nse to N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; an inhibitor of NO biosynthesis),
relative to the response to noradrenaline, has been reported in hypertensi
ve patients and interpreted as evidence of I educed basal NO biosynthesis.
We sought to determine whether reduced sensitivity of forearm vasculature t
o the vasoconstrictor action of L-NMMA relative to that of noradrenaline is
a consistent finding in essential hypertension. We studied a group of pati
ents (n = 32; blood pressure 176 +/- 4/102 +/- 2 mmHg; means +/- S.E.M.) an
d a group of healthy normotensive controls (n = 32; blood pressure 130 +/-
2/75 +/- 1 mmHg). Noradrenaline (60-240 pmol.min(-1)) and L-NMMA (1-4 mu mo
l.min(-1)) were infused into the brachial artery, and forearm blood flow wa
s measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. The effects of each vasocon
strictor were similar in hypertensive and control subjects. The highest dos
e of L-NMMA reduced forearm blood flow by 0.75 +/- 0.12 ml.min(-1).dl(-1) i
n the control group and by 0.89 +/- 0.10 ml.min(-1).dl(-1) in the hypertens
ive group. The study had 90% power (with P = 0.05) to detect a 10% differen
ce in forearm blood flow response between the hypertensive and control grou
ps. We conclude that reduced sensitivity of forearm resistance vasculature
to the vasoconstrictor action of L-NMMA is not a universal feature of essen
tial hypertension. This argues against a primary role for reduced basal NO
biosynthesis in skeletal muscle resistance vessels in the pathogenesis of e
ssential hypertension.