Effects of habitat patch size and temperature on the distribution and abundance of ground beetles (Coleoptera : Carabidae) in an old field

Citation
To. Crist et Rg. Ahern, Effects of habitat patch size and temperature on the distribution and abundance of ground beetles (Coleoptera : Carabidae) in an old field, ENV ENTOMOL, 28(4), 1999, pp. 681-689
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
ISSN journal
0046225X → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
681 - 689
Database
ISI
SICI code
0046-225X(199908)28:4<681:EOHPSA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The effects of habitat size, patch isolation, and temperature on the distri bution and abundance of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) were studied within an old field in southwestern Ohio. A grass field was subdivided by mowing to create 16 plots, each containing 9 unmowed habitat patches that d iffered in size among 4 treatments (1 m(2), 4 m(2), 9 m(2), and coni iguous ). A total of 177 pitfall traps was placed in unmowed patches and in mowed areas, and 444 beetles were captured from midsummer to fall of 1995. More t han 75% of the Harpalus pensylvanicus (DeGeer) captures were in 1-m(2) patc hes during midsummer, but 92 and 87% were in the mowed area during late sum mer and fall, respectively. Peak captures of Calathus opaculus LeConte chan ged from 72% in patches >4 m(2) during late summer to 81% in 1-m(2) patches and mowed areas during fall. Pterostichus atratus (Newman) was abundant in late summer when 76% of the captures were in patches >9 m(2) patches. Thus , large vegetation patches (greater than or equal to 4 m(2)) as well as ope n areas were important to the distribution and abundance of carabid beetles in an uncultivated habitat. Seasonal changes in captures of H. pensylvanic us and C. opaculus among habitats were consistent with their preferred temp eratures. Despite habitat and seasonal differences, all 3 species showed th e same positive relationship between distribution and abundance across trea tments and months. We suggest that this general distribution-abundance patt ern can be explained by species responses to the thermal environment as it varies among habitats and season.