DEVELOPMENTAL-CHANGES IN THE GIBBERELLIN-INDUCED GROWTH-RESPONSE IN STEM SEGMENTS OF LIGHT-GROWN PEA GENOTYPES

Citation
Nm. Barratt et Pj. Davies, DEVELOPMENTAL-CHANGES IN THE GIBBERELLIN-INDUCED GROWTH-RESPONSE IN STEM SEGMENTS OF LIGHT-GROWN PEA GENOTYPES, Plant growth regulation, 21(2), 1997, pp. 127-134
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
01676903
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
127 - 134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-6903(1997)21:2<127:DITGGI>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The effects of GA on stem elongation were studied using segments from one tall and three dwarf light-grown pea genotypes varying in endogeno us hormone content. Stem segments were cut at two distinct ages: when the fourth internode was at about 6-13 % of full expansion (early-expa nsion) or at 18-25 % of full expansion (mid-expansion). Light microsco py and how cytometry were used to demonstrate that GA does not induce cell division in excised pea stem segments. The growth studied here wa s strictly elongation. Measurement of final segment length after 48 ho urs and high resolution measurement of growth kinetics over 20 hours u sing an angular position transducer were done on segments treated with hormone solutions. Our data indicate that the action of GA on stem el ongation can be classified into two distinct modes. The first, apparen t in early-expansion stem segments, shows distinct growth kinetics and is independent of the endogenous IAA concentration of the segments. Q uantitation of IAA by GC/MS in early-expansion segments of wild type p ea incubated with gibberellin shows that an increase in IAA concentrat ion is part of the GA response in such segments. The second mode of GA action is evinced in mid-expansion segments. Whereas there is no shor t term (< 20 h) response to GA alone (as determined by growth kinetics ), there is a long term (48 h) response whose magnitude decreases acro ss the genotypes with decreasing endogenous hormone content. Growth re sponses indicate that in mid-expansion segments exogenous GA acts by e nhancing IAA action but appears to be unable to augment endogenous IAA content. Contradictory reports of the response of excised stem segmen ts to GA can be reconciled when tissue genotype and developmental stag e are considered.