Background. Given the limited specialist resources available to cope with t
he rising demand for genetic services, it has been proposed that at least s
ome of these services are provided by primary care in the future.
Objective. We aimed to explore GPs' attitudes towards new developments in g
enetics, to establish the role they envisage for primary care and to clearl
y define the education, information and training needed to support them in
this role.
Methods. We carried out a qualitative study with GPs using four focus group
s (26 GPs) and 15 individual semi-structured interviews.
Results. GPs perceive genetics as an important and increasingly relevant to
pic for primary care. Views on the appropriate level of involvement for pri
mary care are mixed. GPs currently lack the relevant knowledge and skills t
o manage patients concerned about their family history. Other potential bar
riers to increasing primary care involvement included the time and costs in
volved, and ethical and legal concerns.
Conclusion. If primary care is to become more involved in the delivery of g
enetic services in the future, then a major educational effort is required
to raise awareness of the potential scope and limitations of new developmen
ts.