Preoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma bymagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and hysteroscopy: diagnostic efficacy of MRI combined with hysteroscopy
H. Shen et al., Preoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma bymagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and hysteroscopy: diagnostic efficacy of MRI combined with hysteroscopy, GYNAEC ENDO, 8(4), 1999, pp. 205-212
Objective To evaluate the preoperative diagnostic usefulness of magnetic re
sonance imaging (MRI) combined with hysteroscopy, for the assessment of myo
metrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma.
Design Prospective observational study.
Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Ryukyu University Hos
pital, Okinawa, Japan.
Subjects 73 patients with untreated endometrial carcinoma.
Interventions The findings of myometrial tumour invasion preoperatively obs
erved by MRI and hysteroscopy were compared with the histopathological find
ings from surgical specimens.
Main outcome measures The sensitivity and specificity of MRI combined with
hysteroscopy in diagnosing myometrial tumour invasion.
Results In diagnosing myometrial tumour invasion (absence or presence of my
ometrial invasion), the sensitivities and specificities were 82.0% and 100%
in MRI, 80.0% and 95.7% in hysteroscopy, and 92.0% and 95.7% in MRI combin
ed with hysteroscopy. The sensitivity in MRI combined with hysteroscopy was
significantly higher with a false-negative rate of only 8.0%, than that of
the other two methods (P=0.025; P=0.014). The differences in specificity w
ere not statistically significant among these three methods (P>0.05). MRI h
ad a 87.8% accuracy in assessing the depth of myometrial invasion.
Conclusion These results indicate that MRI combined with hysteroscopy is an
excellent diagnostic approach, superior to MRI or hysteroscopy alone, for
the evaluation of myometrial tumour invasion, because MRI and hysteroscopy
combined can compensate for the disadvantage or defect in each diagnostic p
rocedure.