Mirizzi's syndrome must be ruled out in the differential diagnosis of any patients with obstructive jaundice

Citation
O. Karakoyunlar et al., Mirizzi's syndrome must be ruled out in the differential diagnosis of any patients with obstructive jaundice, HEP-GASTRO, 46(28), 1999, pp. 2178-2182
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology","da verificare
Journal title
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
01726390 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
28
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2178 - 2182
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-6390(199907/08)46:28<2178:MSMBRO>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mirizzi syndrome is a rare benign complication of long-sta nding cholelithiasis and neither diagnostic modality nor clinical feature h as a 100% sensitivity and specificity. The objective of our study was to ca ll attention to the importance of this rare syndrome with its miscellaneous treatments. METHODOLOGY: Between January 1992 and June 1997, a total of 8 (4 females an d 4 males) patients, who were operated and diagnosed as Mirizzi syndrome, w ere retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age was 53.75 years. During the same time period 0.98% of the total 812 cholelithiasis patients were Mirizzi syndrome. The ultrasoun d was used in 7, computed tomography (CT)in 4 and endoscopic retrograde cho langiopancreatography (ERCP) in 2 cases. Ultrasound allowed the detection o f cholelithiasis in all, but proximal bile duct dilatation in only 71% of c ases. CT detected the non-specific findings of syndrome in 75% of cases. In 2 patients, because of the difficulties due to the patients themselves and the technical management problems, ERCP could not detect the pathology pro perly. In 2 of 5 type I patients, we performed only cholecystectomy and in another 2 cholecystectomy plus T-tube drainage. In 1 case, due to major hep atic duct injury during surgery, cholecystectomy plus hepaticojejunostomy o ver the Y-stent was performed. Biliary fistula developed in I patient with T-tube drainage and was successfully managed with conservative treatment. I n all type II patients we preferred cholecystectomy plus choledochoduodenos tomy and all of them were free of complications. CONCLUSIONS: If there is no question about the security of the common bile duct at surgery in type I patients, we recommended cholecystectomy, otherwi se cholecystectomy plus exploration of common bile duct and/or drainage sho uld be the procedure of choice. However, in type II patients cholecystectom y plus choledochoduodenostomy is a safe and effective procedure to perform.