NIFEDIPINE GITS VERSUS DILTIAZEM IN CHRONIC STABLE ANGINA - A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER STUDY

Citation
L. Zanolla et al., NIFEDIPINE GITS VERSUS DILTIAZEM IN CHRONIC STABLE ANGINA - A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER STUDY, British journal of clinical practice, 1997, pp. 27-35
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00070947
Year of publication
1997
Supplement
88
Pages
27 - 35
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0947(1997):<27:NGVDIC>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
In order to compare the efficacy of nifedipine gastrointestinal therap eutic system (GITS) with diltiazem, 99 patients with chronic stable an gina were studied in a parallel-group randomised trial. According to t he results of the two exercise tolerance tests (ETTs) performed during the placebo run-in, patients were divided into a fixed threshold grou p if the variability in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression was 20%, or a variable threshold group if it was higher. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the time to 1 mm ST-depression on a bicycle Err after 4 wee ks of treatment, adjusting for the baseline value. The adjusted means were 7.44 min for nifedipine GITS and 7.68 min for diltiazem; the diff erence was -0.24 min, with a lower 90% confidence limit of -0.90, whic h is within the stated interval for equivalence. The same result was c onfirmed by the 'intention-to-treat' analysis, and comparable results were obtained both in fixed and in variable threshold groups. The inci dence of side effects was 12% with nifedipine GITS and 8.2% with dilti azem. Nifedipine GITS and diltiazem were found to be equally effective in increasing exercise tolerance in chronic stable angina patients.