L. Zanolla et al., NIFEDIPINE GITS VERSUS DILTIAZEM IN CHRONIC STABLE ANGINA - A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER STUDY, British journal of clinical practice, 1997, pp. 27-35
In order to compare the efficacy of nifedipine gastrointestinal therap
eutic system (GITS) with diltiazem, 99 patients with chronic stable an
gina were studied in a parallel-group randomised trial. According to t
he results of the two exercise tolerance tests (ETTs) performed during
the placebo run-in, patients were divided into a fixed threshold grou
p if the variability in time to 1 mm ST-segment depression was 20%, or
a variable threshold group if it was higher. Efficacy was assessed by
comparing the time to 1 mm ST-depression on a bicycle Err after 4 wee
ks of treatment, adjusting for the baseline value. The adjusted means
were 7.44 min for nifedipine GITS and 7.68 min for diltiazem; the diff
erence was -0.24 min, with a lower 90% confidence limit of -0.90, whic
h is within the stated interval for equivalence. The same result was c
onfirmed by the 'intention-to-treat' analysis, and comparable results
were obtained both in fixed and in variable threshold groups. The inci
dence of side effects was 12% with nifedipine GITS and 8.2% with dilti
azem. Nifedipine GITS and diltiazem were found to be equally effective
in increasing exercise tolerance in chronic stable angina patients.