Drug delivery from the Turbuhaler and Nebuhaler pressurized metered dose inhaler to various age groups of children with asthma

Citation
L. Agertoft et al., Drug delivery from the Turbuhaler and Nebuhaler pressurized metered dose inhaler to various age groups of children with asthma, J AEROSOL M, 12(3), 1999, pp. 161-169
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG
ISSN journal
08942684 → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
161 - 169
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-2684(199923)12:3<161:DDFTTA>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
A total of 198 children aged 3 to 15 years inhaled a single dose of 200 mu g budesonide from a Nebuhaler pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and a Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler in a randomized crossover study. The budeson ide dose delivered to a patient was assessed by measuring the amount of dru g deposited on a filter inserted between the inhaler outlet and the patient 's mouth. The dose of budesonide deposited on the filter and the estimated dose of particles with a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 5 mu m or less after inhalation from the Turbuhaler were both approximately twice the values inhaled from the pMDI Nebuhaler in children less than 5 years of age (P < 0.01). The variation in the dose delivered to the patient was sim ilar for the two inhalers in children over 5 years old. In 3- to 4-year-old children, dose delivery to the patient was higher and/or more consistent f rom the pMDI Nebuhaler than from the Turbuhaler. Filter dose after Turbuhal er treatment varied significantly from peak inspiratory Mow rate through th e Turbuhaler (PIFTbh) (P < 0.01). The percentage of children producing a PI FTbh greater than 50 L/min decreased with age (89%, 45%, and 14% in 5-, 4-, and 3-year-old children, respectively). It is concluded that drug delivery to a child with asthma varies with age and inhalation device. Further stud ies are needed to assess the clinical importance of this finding.