Sister-chromatid arm cohesion is lost during the metaphase I/anaphase I tra
nsition to allow homologue separation, To obtain needed information on this
process we have analysed in grasshopper bivalents the sequential release o
f arm cohesion in relation to the behaviour of chromatid axes. Results show
that sister axes are associated during early metaphase I but separate duri
ng late metaphase I leading to a concomitant change of chromosome structure
that implies the loss of sister-kinetochore cohesion. Afterwards, homologu
es initiate their separation asynchronously depending on their size, and nu
mber and position of chiasmata. In all bivalents thin chromatin strands at
the telomeres appeared as the last point of contact between sister chromati
ds. Additionally, we have analysed the participation of phosphoproteins rec
ognised by the MPM2 monoclonal antibody against mitotic phosphoproteins in
arm cohesion in bivalents and two different kinds of univalents. Results sh
ow the absence of MPM-2 phosphoproteins at the interchromatid domain in mit
otic chromosomes and meiotic univalents, but their presence in metaphase I
bivalents. These phosphoproteins are lost at the onset of anaphase I. Taken
together, these data have prompted us to propose a 'working' model for the
release of arm cohesion during meiosis I. The model suggests that MPM-2 ph
osphoproteins may act as cohesive proteins associating sister axes. Their m
odification, once all bivalents are correctly aligned at the metaphase plat
e, would trigger a change of chromosome structure and the sequential releas
e of sister-kinetochore, arm, and telomere cohesions.