Dh. Vice et Pm. Halleck, The effects of soil environment on the ability of surface geochemical surveys to detect underlying hydrocarbon traps, J GEOCHEM E, 66(3), 1999, pp. 457-468
Soil surveys represent an inexpensive potential technique for preliminary h
ydrocarbon exploration. However large scatter and lack of repeatability hav
e limited their use. To determine whether a signal from a reservoir is actu
ally detectable, a series of closely spaced soil samples was collected alon
g a traverse line across a gas-storage reservoir. Gases were desorbed from
the soil by heating and were analyzed for their content of light hydrocarbo
ns using gas chromatography. Additional information concerning the soil and
its environment was also collected at each sample site to investigate the
source of scatter in the data, Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to
determine whether differences in ethane concentration from one site to anot
her were significant and whether they could be correlated with the reservoi
r boundaries and/or other variables. The results do show systematic variati
ons in ethane concentration and a strong correlation between ethane concent
rations and the known reservoir boundaries. However, strong correlations we
re also found with some of the soil environment variables, specifically the
moisture content and the land use (presumably related to the amount of dis
turbance). Unless these and other soil environment factors are taken into a
ccount, variability in gas content caused by them can mask any relationship
with a hydrocarbon reservoir. Two other significant observations emerge fr
om the study. First, sample spacing needs to be closer than that used in co
nventional surveys in order to detect boundaries and to separate the reserv
oir signal from surface noise. Second, the individual light hydrocarbons ap
pear to behave differently in the soil. Methane is present in low concentra
tions despite its high concentration in the reservoir gas. Ethane is more a
bundant and was chosen for use in the analysis. Propane and butane have ver
y low concentrations, reflecting their low concentrations in the natural ga
s in the reservoir. However; pentane, though dilute in natural gas, is very
abundant in the soil. We believe that pentane is retained because soil tem
peratures are near its Liquidus, particularly during cold weather. This mak
es pentane potentially unreliable as an indicator of underlying gas flux. (
C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.