In 1992, the Norwegian Parliament adopted a plan for brown bear Ursus
arctos management. The main goal of the plan was two-fold: (1) ensure
viable bear populations within five core areas along the border of nei
ghbouring countries; and (2) limit the damage caused by bear on sheep
Ovis aries grazing on open rangeland which has increased over the last
few years. In this study we have examined the possibility of attainin
g both these political aims. Sheep losses in title study areas within
bear core areas rose considerably during the period 1981-1993, when th
e Scandinavian bear population increased by 1.5% a year. We found a si
gnificant correlation between the estimated number of bears and the lo
ss of grazing ewes in both areas. No such relationship was found in th
e control areas (considered to be without bears) adjacent to the study
area. We found no relationship between number of ew:es lost and numbe
r of ewes grazing. Shooting of bears that presumably killed sheep had
no effect on the number of ewes lost during the following season, prob
ably because the number of bears killed in Norway was less than the nu
mber of bears immigrating from Sweden. Killing more bears is not compa
tible with the political aims of the management plan. It is difficult
to reach all the political goals under the current situation. The loss
of sheep will probably continue to increase unless changes are made i
n sheep husbandry methods in the core areas. Alternatively, sheep must
be moved out of the areas set aside for the re-establishment of bears
. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.