O. Kocsis et al., Comparison of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy determined from shear and temperature microstructure, J MAR SYST, 21(1-4), 1999, pp. 67-84
A total of 826 temperature and shear microstructure profiles, measured duri
ng 12 days in March 1996 in Lake Neuchatel (Switzerland), are used to compa
re estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation, determined by the Bat
chelor (mu T; temperature) and the dissipation (mu S; shear) methods. Posit
ioned horizontally 35 m apart, the two different profilers were raised thro
ugh the nearly-homogeneous surface boundary layer. The collected time serie
s covered different atmospheric forcings, including calm (approximate to 1
m s(-1)) and windy (> 10 m s(-1)) periods, as well as periods of thermally-
induced convection (nights) and stratification (sunny days). Consequently,
dissipation varied over 6 orders of magnitudes from 10(-11) to 10(-5) W kg(
-1). The comparison of the 72'674 pairs of dissipation estimates, determine
d from 25 cm long vertical profile segments, reveals excellent agreement fo
r the bulk of the estimates, with deviations smaller than a factor of 2. In
a relatively small subset, collected under strong heating, deviations of u
p to a factor of 6 occur in 1-4 m depth. These deviations are, however, jus
t about within the 95% confidence limits of the bootstrap distribution. Und
er low turbulence the mu T method tends to provide slightly larger dissipat
ion, whereas for high wind-induced turbulence the mu S method gives larger
dissipation. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.