Comparison of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy determined from shear and temperature microstructure

Citation
O. Kocsis et al., Comparison of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy determined from shear and temperature microstructure, J MAR SYST, 21(1-4), 1999, pp. 67-84
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences","Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS
ISSN journal
09247963 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
1-4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
67 - 84
Database
ISI
SICI code
0924-7963(199906)21:1-4<67:CODOTK>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
A total of 826 temperature and shear microstructure profiles, measured duri ng 12 days in March 1996 in Lake Neuchatel (Switzerland), are used to compa re estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation, determined by the Bat chelor (mu T; temperature) and the dissipation (mu S; shear) methods. Posit ioned horizontally 35 m apart, the two different profilers were raised thro ugh the nearly-homogeneous surface boundary layer. The collected time serie s covered different atmospheric forcings, including calm (approximate to 1 m s(-1)) and windy (> 10 m s(-1)) periods, as well as periods of thermally- induced convection (nights) and stratification (sunny days). Consequently, dissipation varied over 6 orders of magnitudes from 10(-11) to 10(-5) W kg( -1). The comparison of the 72'674 pairs of dissipation estimates, determine d from 25 cm long vertical profile segments, reveals excellent agreement fo r the bulk of the estimates, with deviations smaller than a factor of 2. In a relatively small subset, collected under strong heating, deviations of u p to a factor of 6 occur in 1-4 m depth. These deviations are, however, jus t about within the 95% confidence limits of the bootstrap distribution. Und er low turbulence the mu T method tends to provide slightly larger dissipat ion, whereas for high wind-induced turbulence the mu S method gives larger dissipation. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.